Piero scaruffi peter brotzmann
![piero scaruffi peter brotzmann piero scaruffi peter brotzmann](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1C0TUXUGpjc/YHSKlG138zI/AAAAAAAAB5w/htdGOxu18jInXEcRYSkZhacbXYDNWkNYwCLcBGAsYHQ/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/MM%2B2021%2B12.%2BApr.%2BNeumann%2C%2BReim.jpg)
Even if the initial idea for both was equally ingenious, the more explored or developed example would usually show a lot more understanding, effort, engagement, expressiveness, importance (etc) given to that idea. In such a comparison between this and the fleeting novelty, there would tend to be a massive differential in creativity between the two.
#Piero scaruffi peter brotzmann full#
Or one can come up with an innovation (or series of them) continuously expounded over the whole course of an album or symphony or across the scale of an entire work, to the point where there is a very full exploration, development or culmination of that creative idea or series of ideas. One can come up with a fleeting novelty, that has little meaning, or an incomplete purpose, perhaps lasting a few seconds at some point within a song, or in a film, or as a small part in a painting. Without such an alignment and purpose, an artist may be coming up with something no one has heard or seen before, but the result would tend to be aimless or insignificant.
![piero scaruffi peter brotzmann piero scaruffi peter brotzmann](https://www.scaruffi.com/jazz/stern.jpg)
Of utmost importance is that creativity is significant largely in alignment and proportional to its purpose and contribution to the emotional or conceptual expression of the work. However, there are degrees of creativity and it is the most singular examples that hold the greatest potential at making a lasting or permanent impact (because they can't be imitated, even if derived from). To greater or lesser degree, each and every artist could be considered "singular", as there are no two that are exactly alike.
![piero scaruffi peter brotzmann piero scaruffi peter brotzmann](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41BgObKDXQL._AC_SY780_.jpg)
These are each artists that expressed their art from a very singular idiom and are virtually inimitable. There isn't another Beethoven, or Orson Welles, or John Coltrane, or Michelangelo, or Captain Beefheart. Certain artists are closer to this ideal than others. This would, probably axiomatically, be inimitable. One could probably say that, ultimately, this would be a work or artist that most closely expresses a unique point-of-view or their own individualistic nature in their Art. Perhaps in its most ideal and fundamental form this could be extrapolated into: "expressed through a singular intelligence, individualistic nature or idiom". originality, progressiveness or imagination. Some artists are more conceptually inclined while others are more emotionally inclined, but regardless, these share similar artistic potential.Ĭreativity: the ability to transcend traditional ideas, rules, patterns, relationships, or the like, and to create meaningful new ideas, forms, methods, interpretations, etc. One will find that you can’t have an expression of emotion without the artist simultaneously conveying a concept along with it, and vice versa: a concept cannot be expressed without some degree of emotion being conveyed. These two points (Emotion and Concept) are virtually interchangeable. It is not so important which concept is being expressed, but to what degree of engagement is the artist expressing it? It is primarily this factor that makes it affecting or compelling. It is not so important which emotion is being expressed, but to what degree of engagement is the artist expressing it? It is primarily this factor that makes it affecting or compelling.Įngagement: the act of engaging or the state of being engaged involvement.Įngage: to attract the attention or efforts of (a person or persons).Ĭonceptual: pertaining to concepts or the forming of concepts.Ĭoncept: an idea of something formed by mentally combining all its characteristics or particulars a construct.īy “conceptual” I am referring to any concept or confluence of concepts being expressed, whether a psychedelic, abstract or lucid experience, whether a dangerous, comforting or mysterious circumstance, a relationship torn apart or coming together, an existential crises or spiritual revelation, etc. To be clear, by “emotional” I am referring not just to "pathos" or the most dramatic states, but to any emotion or confluence of emotions being expressed. The following factors are inherent in all Art and govern all qualitative considerations:Įmotional: pertaining to or involving any state of emotion.Įmotion: any of the feelings of joy, sorrow, fear, hate, love, etc. > For my "GUIDE: GREATEST ROCK ALBUMS - ANALYSIS/KEY INSIGHTS" section, go here: > For my "GUIDE: GREATEST ROCK ALBUMS - RECOMMENDED ORDER" section, go here: 25, 26, 27 Next View previous topic :: View next topic